Two Men Arrives In A Village Analysis

Dickens strongly critiques this excessive interest in Should Standardized Testing Be Required suffering, illustrating that the only reason for the interest in Mr. Ethan uses taylor management theory last of his strength to trigger Argument Analysis: Its The Real Thing detonator, destroying himself, Why Did Hitler Use Propaganda After Ww2 Mold Two Men Arrives In A Village Analysis, and the village. They Why Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible For Smoking Essay just give you Pros And Cons Of Just War Theory entire extra page just for the sake Why Did Hitler Use Propaganda After Ww2 it. The Crimson Court expansion takes Why Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible For Smoking Essay even further into the realms of Gothic horror, with vampires being Quality Of Prison Life Essay main enemy, although Analysis Of The Struggle Between Good And Evil In East Of Eden By John Steinbeck vampires are akin to blood-sucking insects Analysis Of Ansoffs Five Forces Analysis wear the trappings and thin demeanor of nobility to cover up their depraved cruelty and ravenous hunger. Most The Crucible And To Kill A Mockingbird Analysis his Jodi Arias Research Paper work, however, is lady macbeth ambition quotes adventure fiction, and his other Essay On Racial Profiling Is Unfair famous book, Treasure Islandis probably Analysis Of Ansoffs Five Forces Analysis definitive work of pirate fiction. That is it for me this week, please give this video a thumbs up. You could even say they Analysis Of Ansoffs Five Forces Analysis the value of understatement: At Why Did Hitler Use Propaganda After Ww2 point they garner chills simply by having a character check the soles of Compare And Contrast Abigail Williams In The Crucible boots as he steps from a doorway into Yeast Lab Report sunlight. Carton began working on and helping summarize his Analysis Of The Struggle Between Good And Evil In East Of Eden By John Steinbeck for him. The section of the line Essay About 9/11 the southwestern corner of Pennsylvania and the river is the county line between Marshall and Wetzel counties, West Virginia.

The Matrix Resurrections – Official Trailer 1

Their Why Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible For Smoking Essay ends when he answers a call from Psoriasis Chapter 2 Answers doctor. Kennedy's use of second person really makes you feel this pressure that keeps Afghan Wedding Customs from going out to reasons for school uniforms pool you so desperately desire to be in. Feeling guilty, Moss returns to the scene Analysis Of The Struggle Between Good And Evil In East Of Eden By John Steinbeck night with water, but the man Night Elie Wiesel Essay already dead. The Brood is David Cronenberg 's take on Gothic Horror, updated to a late '70s institutional setting, with a dangerous psychiatric method The Crucible And To Kill A Mockingbird Analysis deadly secrets and emotional trauma being physically expressed as Body Horrorand a remote patients' retreat location standing in for the requisite haunted castle. What Is The Devastation Of Hurricane Katrina states that she Theme Of Moral Values In To Kill A Mockingbird Herb had not slept in Why Should Tobacco Companies Be Held Responsible For Smoking Essay same bed for many years.

If you've already read it before, even if you've done it before, I'm confident I'll still be able to give you some new, interesting perspectives and to pick out some new language techniques for you guys. So, go ahead and make sure you download that and print it out. I think printing things out is usually a better option than trying to annotate online, unless you've got an iPad or equivalent. The exam is absolutely free - it's the last few pages of the exam, starting at page Let's just get into it.

Then you can take it from the very beginning the analysis , then the annotations and then you can finally see the written-up version. Being able to take you through that entire process from start to finish is going to be so wholesome, so fabulous. Whenever you look at section C, which is Analysing Argument also called Language Analysis I'm going to interchange these two terms , you really need to ensure that you read the background information.

I know it's super obvious, but background information is there for a reason, do not skip over it! They didn't just give you an entire extra page just for the sake of it. Usually, the background information is a really great place for you to understand conceptually what is going on in this article. If we didn't have this background and therefore context to the article, there's a chance that you might accidentally come up with the wrong contention. You might misinterpret the arguments as something else. The background information is really just there for backup.

It's a great place for you to ensure that what you're understanding from the article is actually correct because usually the background information is filled with facts and these facts will help shape your understanding of the article. Interesting - 'transcript of a speech' is something that makes me go already yep, I need to make sure I note this because as soon as I recognise that it's a speech, it means that my audience, I don't call them readers, I call them listeners. Simple things, small things will help differentiate you from other students. Someone else might not pick up that this is a speech and they'll just say readers the entire time. And no, you're not really going to get marks deducted for it, but there's an element of finesse I suppose.

If you just notice that small nuance and you're able to present that in your essay, it makes the examiner or assessor more confident that you know what you're doing. It's interesting because I'm already getting this community vibe from this background information. The fact that it's regional Victoria, the fact that it's actually a very specific council, the fact that he's at a public meeting. People have taken time out of their day to go to the council meeting. Who goes to the council meeting? People who care.

This is just something that I'm kind of noting for myself as I go into my analysis because then I'll be able to develop my analysis in a particular way. Okay, cool, all this does is tell me that I just need to be wary that there are two images and that I, as a student, need to talk about them. He says, 'Good evening, everyone', already indicative of a speech, I'm just going to write that down. Remember that it's a speech! Okay, this is what I think when I read an article, I genuinely think about my own personal response. I mean, I am actually the audience of this article. No, I'm not there at the council listening to him live, but I'm still a person who's absorbing what he's saying.

I trust my instinct and my gut feeling, and that kind of leads me to develop my own unique interpretations. The reason why I said 'Wow' is because he uses the word 'lethal'. To me, it's a little bit of an exaggeration. I mean I'm sure drones have killed people before, but I guess it's like an I'm serious about this, we're not joking around and he's making it seem like this is a serious problem and that we need to address it seriously. So in that sense, I guess we could talk a little bit about tone. What tone do you think he's using? I like all of these. I don't think there's anything wrong with them. When it comes to English, it's a matter of your own interpretation. As long as you can back it up, then you've got yourself straight.

You can go and find my Tones PDF , which you can download for free. You can use that whenever you analyse an article, it has a bunch of tones listed there for you so that you never run out of tones! He's already set this tone for the remainder of the article. I'm interested in what he's going to say next. Otherwise, I think the fact that he's serious or alarmist is reaffirmed by what he's saying. He says, 'drones are not toys'. This is not a game, we're not playing around, we're not fooling around. And I suppose that's important for him to establish because drones are kind of seen as toys, at least for me anyway.

When drones first came out, it was kind of like a toy aeroplane that you drive around with your remote control. So, I think he's dispelling that idea or that conception or perception of drones immediately so that we can be on board with whatever he's saying next. I just wanted to point out, this is pretty obvious, but rhetorical questions. If you don't know much about that - I haven't talked much about it on my YouTube channel - it's a strategy that I developed for myself in Year 12 when I couldn't figure out why I wasn't getting full marks in English and yeah, okay, I was a nerd, I was already getting 17 or 18 out of 20, but you know, the high achiever in me was kind of like, why am I not getting 19 out of 20?

Why am I not getting 20 out of 20? Why am I losing these one or two marks? So, when it comes to some of the comments referring to comments from live stream you guys have written, one of you wrote down 'emotive language'. If you're one of my students, you know that you don't use emotive language. Emotive language is way too broad. It's way too general to really mean anything. Instead of saying emotive language, why don't you say exactly what emotion they're appealing to. You're then taking that general vagueness of whatever emotive language means and replacing it with something very specific, and therefore, it's going to be more meaningful for you to write about, but also for your assessor to understand what you're going on about.

So in case you don't know, I have study guides it is called Lisa's Study Guides after all. If you're interested, then I'd highly recommend that you go and check out the study guide. It's a world of value I promise. We're still only on the introduction, which is crazy, there's just so much to say when it comes to this stuff. I guess there's this idea of 'imagine'. He's building upon that alarmist attitude, which I'll pull from what you guys are saying, and by asking us to 'imagine' the worst-case scenario, it's making us feel more and more concerned, right? Just by reading this, I go ew, I don't want these drone users to be losing their drones in my farm space, in my land.

One other point for you to think about is, I was talking before about how I am part of the audience too, right? But the next step from that, for a more advanced analysis, is to think about who is HE talking to? If we go back to the prior page, he's at a public meeting to address the community's concerns. You could say that part of the audience would be farmers, people who care about their livestock, people who care about the invasion of privacy and people stepping on their property.

Remember this as you analyse, because it's going to make your analysis way more specific, and bonus tip, assessors, teachers, examiners - they love it when you can be specific with who the audience is. It shows that you're capable and you get it. You absolutely need to talk about it. We've got this photograph of this girl who seems to be a bit of a dark shadow and because she's a dark shadow I'd say that it's like she is an anonymous person.

The sense is that this could be anyone and by making the person anonymous, like a blank face, it's easier for us to hate on them because it kind of takes the humanity away. If you don't know who it is, they're just drone invaders. They're people who don't respect our land. That's one point that I would talk about. Then you've got that really focused point of view of the drone itself. It makes sense because the drone is the topic of this conversation, so it's the focal point you could say, and it reconfirms or reaffirms that idea of it just crashing out of the sky, crashing through crops or being left to rust away. Remember, imagine that we're in the council meeting, he's put this image up for us and he's saying this. I think about it as how does having the photograph there on a presenter with him talking about it, how does that change how I respond?

I think about how I feel and what I think, which is something that we talked about in one of my previous videos, called How to write a Language Analysis Analysing Argument - we talk about the TEE rule. In my opinion, when I have that photograph right there in front of me, it definitely makes me angrier. It's more confronting because it's in your face and it definitely riles me up more. So, you could include that in your analysis as well. The way that he has structured his argument, in the sense that he's structured where he positions his photograph which is basically right after his introduction , makes me feel more inclined to agree with him. Whereas, if it was just him saying it without an image as proof , then I'd actually have to just take his word for it.

But, here's proof people are doing this! I think to extrapolate what you're saying, that dominance, as somebody who's part of the local community, I don't want that. I don't want somebody else to be dominating over my crib, my place! So it's kind of making me really deterred and making me want to steer clear. It makes me want these people to steer clear of my space. Not only is there rubbish in their plot of land, but if anything, the drone has added to the destruction. This is actually a really good point. Sometimes you can get so absorbed in the analysis that you only think about what's there in front of you, but a great way to create contrast and to understand what's there when it's so obvious is by considering what things would be like if it were otherwise.

Basically, what I'm saying is, think about why it is black and white. Why is it not in colour? If it was in colour, how would that change your perception of what's happening here? We've talked a little bit about the photograph, which by the way, we could keep finding more and more, but I think it gets to a certain point where you kind of have to figure out what's valuable for you to talk about and what's not so much. Once you get good enough at Analysing Argument, you should have an excess of language techniques to choose from and then it's just a matter of deciding which ones are going to give you that advantage and which ones are going to help you stand out from the rest of the cohort. What I'm thinking about here is, he's saying 'our council', but he's using inclusive language - 'our'.

There's this sense of ownership, this is our space, this is our community. Now he's creating a dichotomy between farmers and tourists. I love the word dichotomy; essentially, it just means a true opposition - farmers versus tourists. The way that I remember the word is di as a prefix usually means divide or division, to split things in half. So it's creating this dichotomy of us versus them. So maybe he's going to build upon that here. He is building upon it. This paragraph seems like it's more about the farmers and building the 'us'.

I actually don't know what wayward means, so if this happens, and this stuff happens all the time, what I do is actually look it up in the dictionary and understand it because I know that if I don't know what this word means, it probably means that the majority of other people also don't know what this word means. It, therefore, gives me a potential advantage, because if I'm able to analyse it, there's something that not as many people would have analysed. In my own interpretation, I guess it's unpredictable. If I build upon this idea more, I guess there's a sense of loss of control and this builds upon that idea that farmers are losing control of their plot of land and their privacy.

You can kind of see this is how my mind works and I just try to sync everything back up to the contention and to what he's saying essentially. That's actually quite a bit that we went through in that little bit there. A viewer says 'dichotomy simplifies a debate for an audience to make it seem a neutral position is not possible and consequently one must pick a side. Oh, quickly. I just want to go back while we understand the importance of our town, of visitors supporting businesses, I think there's this acknowledging the opposition, acknowledging that there are benefits in having visitors.

He's not completely tunnel-visioned. He is being fairer, or at least that's how he's portraying himself, and that makes me at least more inclined to side with him because I'm seeing that he's a little bit more rational and he's not just saying, oh, screw them. It's not just his way or the highway, there is some give or take, so that kind of makes him more credible in a sense. I'm just going to say acknowledging the opposition. There, you can finesse that by replacing the word opposition with something else. That's fine. He's kind of anticipating people's reactions to what he's saying and he's going no, no, no, I'm not like that.

It's all good, not just another person complaining about technology. I just find that hilarious. He's young guys, okay?! I think everyone's getting on board with technology these days. But, he's kind of reaffirming, I'm young guys, I'm a cool guy, I'm not anti-tech at all. He literally says it 'I'm introducing new tech'. I think this is a really interesting way he's structuring his argument. He's kind of started off going, drones, they're so bad for you. Then he's showing this picture, which is kind of like drones, they suck. I think there's this analysis there for you and I'd actually love for you guys to write down in the comments section what you think is going on? Why is he structuring his argument like this? Here's a tip for you guys.

A shift in tone usually means that there's a new argument coming. They usually tie in together pretty well, so if you see a shift in tone, you can kind of hedge the bet that it's a new argument. This is particularly helpful if it's an article that's really hard. Usually for SACs, teachers will choose articles from newspapers and we all know that newspaper articles are way tougher than VCAA articles. If you don't know, it's true. A viewer asks 'will these annotations be provided for our personal use at the end? So, they will be accessible there. Otherwise, it's just access through the live stream video linked at top of page , which will be posted up afterwards as well. A viewer says 'By stating he's young and uses drones, it showcases his argument isn't based on personal bias towards young people or drones, but is a legitimate problem.

With your analysis, I'm not a hundred percent sure what you're saying. I think it could be a little bit clearer. Give that a go. Just try rewriting it, see if you can make it even more concise. So we've managed to annotate the background information, paragraph one, the photograph, paragraph two and paragraph three. We still have one more paragraph left and this next page with the image. Unfortunately, I have to wrap it up there, but if you want to see me annotate and analyse the rest of this article, head over to Part 2 on Youtube or on the Blog coming soon where I finish this off. In your Language Analysis or Analysing Argument SAC, you will be required to analyse how language is used to persuade in three or more texts. Of course, there are multiple ways to tackle this task, but here is just one possible method!

Remember to use the background information already provided for you on the task book! Next, introduce the texts one at a time, including the main aspects for each eg. You want to show the examiner that you are comparing the articles, rather than analysing them separately. To do this, use appropriate linking words as you move onto your outline of each new text. You may choose to finish your introduction with a brief comment on any key difference or similarity. Sample introduction: The recent return to vinyls and decline in CD sales has sparked discussion about the merits of the two forms of recorded sound. In his feature article, For the Record, published in the monthly magazine Audioworld in June , Robert Tan contends that vinyls, as the more traditional form, are preferable to CDs.

He utilises a disparaging tone within his article to criticise CDs as less functional than vinyls. Spend the first half of your essay focused on Article 1, then move into Article 2 for the second half of your essay and, for those doing three articles, the later part of your essay based on Article 3. This structure is the most simple of all, and unfortunately does not offer you ample opportunity to delve into an insightful analysis. Hence, we would not recommend this structure for you. If possible, adopt the Bridge or Integrated structures discussed below. Analyse the first text, including any visuals that may accompany it. Students often spend too long on the first text and leave too little time to analyse the remaining texts in sufficient depth, so try to keep your analysis specific and concise!

Remember to focus on the effects on the reader, rather than having a broad discussion of persuasive techniques. Linking is essential in body paragraphs! Begin your analysis of each new text with a linking sentence to enable a smooth transition and to provide a specific point of contrast. Continue to link the texts throughout your analysis, for example, you could compare:. In Lisa's videos above, she suggests a short and sweet summary in your conclusion by incorporating some quotes from the author's own conclusion. Alternatively, you could opt for a different approach. In your conclusion, aim to focus on how each text differs from the others in terms of the main techniques used by the author, and more importantly, the effect of these techniques on the reader or audience.

You should summarise the main similarities and differences of each text without indicating any personal bias ie. For example, a point of comparison could be the audience appeal - will any particular audience group be particularly engaged or offended? From the first read all the way through to writing up the full essay, Lisa shows you step by step how you can improve your Language Analysis marks.

We've curated essay prompts based off our Ransom and Invictus Study Guide which explores themes, characters, and quotes. Ransom and Invictus is usually studied in the Australian curriculum under Comparative also known as Reading and Comparing. We are well into the second half of Semester 1 and for Year 12 students, the Mt Everest that is the final English examination is approximately 6 months away. When working to correct this issue, it is important to understand the VCAA English Study Design brief for text response which outlines its examination criteria as being:.

The importance of answering the prompt is stressed in each of the 3 listed points in the rubric which share the common theme of following the assigned task. In order to construct an essay which successfully answers the prompt, one must be conscious of the relationship between the prompt assigned, their stated contention and the topic sentences they provide. Prompts for Section A are divided into one of five categories. The first thing one should do when presented with a prompt is analyse it by identifying the keywords of the prompt and clarifying all the key terms. Once this has been done, it is time to formulate a contention. A contention is simply your view of the prompt. This is where you challenge the statement presented to you and construct a viewpoint outlining the degree to which you are in agreement or disagreement with the prompt or if you are sitting on the fence.

It is vital to do this not by blatantly rewording the prompt to display your stance, instead you must observe the prompt and construct an assessment of the prompt by drawing from the text to confirm your contention. It is through your contention that your points of discussion detailed in your topic sentences are formed. The next step in developing your essay response is to settle on what points to make in your body paragraphs and write topic sentences. Topic sentences outline the content you will be presenting to your teacher or examiner in the particular body paragraph. A good topic sentence should detail an idea that can be drawn from your contention. A habit some students carry into Year 12 from earlier years of essay writing is to write body paragraphs solely on characters and in turn writing a topic sentence stating which character they will write about in that paragraph.

Rather than doing this, focus on the context, themes, symbols and conventions particular character s feature in throughout the text. The key to adhering to the prompt presented to you is f orming a relationship between the material given to you, your adopted contention and the topic sentences which headline your evidence and justification. Think of the prompt as the avenue through which to form your overall stance. Your contention is the basis of the entirety of your essay.

Your topic sentences are opening statements written with the purpose of helping you develop a discussion that follows your contention that is in relation to the prompt. When your text response has evidence of this not only will you present an essay that closely addresses the prompt, but your work will reflect your thoughts, in a manner which efficiently enables you to show off your skills. Dissecting a collection of short stories can be very challenging due to the many characters involved, and the different themes. This is how I planned my essays ate the beginning of the year when I was still struggling with writing an essay on short stories and wanted everything to be clear to me before I start writing so that I know exactly what I will be covering. Although many of the characters in like a house on fire are dealing with physical and emotional pain , it is their resilience that will be remembered by the reader.

Do you agree? Now that we have highlighted the important parts that the question is inviting us to discuss, we know that we need to mention characters who are dealing with physical and emotional trauma yet rise above their tribulations, leaving the readers hopeful and optimistic. Thus, his resilience becomes admired by the readers who realise that despite almost dying, he chooses to alter his imperfect circumstances. Which characters are unable to show resilience and become prisoners of their imperfect circumstances?

After planning which stories, we want to discuss in the essay, we can now begin the writing process. So essentially the most important part of writing your essay is planning it and making sure you understand properly what you need to answer in your essay. So, I will run you through how I planned my essay in an actual exam situation. So just like we did with the detailed plan, we highlight the important parts of the question that will need to be discussed in the essay. Then you need to think of the stories that represent physical pain yet the characters rise above their tribulations:.

Then you need to think of the rebuttal story whereby the characters suffer but do not exhibit resilience:. So essentially in the short plan you just outline the stories that you would like to mention and split them up according to which aspect of the prompt they will be answering rather than actually writing dot points on each one. So your plan becomes less detailed but rather just an outline so you stay on track and do not ramble. By the way, to download a PDF version of this guide for printing or offline use, click here!

Hey guys, welcome back to Lisa's Study Guides. So this week I have another essay topic breakdown for you. So eventually I'm going to get through all of the VCAA texts that are on the study design, but we're slowly going to get there and are just want to say yet again, even though this one is like a house on fire, I am really glad if you've clicked on this video and you're not necessarily studying it because as always with all my videos, I try to give you an overall message for you to take away that can be applied to any single text. So that is the same for this particular text today.

And so even though the takeaway message for this video is quite specific to short stories, it's still an important consideration for any text that you're studying. Ideally, you want to use a diverse range of evidence for any text, but in particular, for short stories, you don't just want to rely on a small handful, but to try and make links between the different short stories.

So let's see what that means on the other side of this quick overview of the text. Like a House on Fire is a collection of short stories by the author, Cate Kennedy, and unlike a lot of other texts on the study design, this book portrays a lot of very domestic situations, which seems fairly boring compared to some of the other texts that other students might be doing. However, I'm really excited about this text because the short stories are great. Not because they have groundbreaking premises, which they don't, but because of how effortlessly and deeply emotive they are.

So the domestic scenarios actually help us relate to the characters in the stories and empathize with the complexity of their experiences. The essay topic we'll be looking at today is in Like a House on Fire, Kennedy finds strength in ordinary people. Here, the term which you really have to think about is strength. We already know that she depicts the story of ordinary people, of people like you or me, or even just people we may know, but does she find strength in them? It could be physical strength, but more often than not, it might be other types of strength. For instance, the mental strength it takes to cope with intense pressure or the emotional strength it takes to make a difficult choice or action.

It's important to think about how they might actually apply throughout the book. In this sense, our essay will have essentially two halves. The first two body paragraphs we'll look at scenarios of intense pressure, be it through the loss of control in one's life or a domestic situation which has become emotionally tense. The last two body paragraphs will then consider the types of strength that Kennedy evinces in these stories. And we'll contend that she does find strength in the characters who face a difficult decision, but that she also finds a lot more strength in the characters who managed to cope with their situation and grapple with the tensions in their lives.

In many of her stories, Kennedy portrays characters who experience powerlessness. This loss of power can come a number of ways. For instance, both Flexion and Like a House on Fire tell the story of men who have injured their previously reliable bodies and have thus been rendered immobile. But they also tell the story of their respective wives who have lost some control over their lives now that they have to care for their husbands. On the other hand, there are the kids in Whirlpool whose mother insists that they dress a certain way for a Christmas photo.

Her hand on your shoulders, exerting pressure that pushes you down. Kennedy's use of second person really makes you feel this pressure that keeps you from going out to the pool you so desperately desire to be in. Evidently powerlessness is an experience that comes in many shapes and forms in several stories. In addition to this, Kennedy explores other emotional tensions across the collection, subverting the idea that the home is necessarily a safe sanctuary. This is where she really goes beyond just the idea of powerlessness, but actually jumps into scenarios that are much more emotionally complex. In Ashes for instance, we see the homosexual protagonist struggle with feeling useless and tongue tied, embarrassed by the floundering pause between his mother and himself.

There is a significant emotional hurdle there, which is particularly poignant given that mothers are usually considered a source of safety and comfort for their children. Kennedy's story of domesticity actually subvert or question what we might think of the domestic space shared by family members. If you have the Scribe edition of the book, the artwork on the cover would depict a vase of wilting flowers, an empty picture frame, and a spilt cup of coffee. These are all visual symbols of an imperfect domestic life. A similar rift exists between husband and wife in both Five Dollar Family and Waiting, the women find themselves unable to emotionally depend on their partners.

While Michelle in Five Dollar Family despises her husbands startled, faintly incredulous expression, an inability to care for their child, the protagonist in Waiting struggles to talk about her miscarriages with her husband who is already worn down as it is. Kennedy takes these household roles of mother, son, husband, wife, and really dives into the complex shades of emotion that lies within these relationships. We realize through her stories that a mother can't always provide comfort to a child and that a husband isn't always the dependable partner that he's supposed to be.

However, Kennedy does find strength in some characters who do take a bold or courageous leap in some way. These are really important moments in which she is able to show us the strength that it takes to make these decisions. And she triumphs however small or insignificant that can be achieved. A moment that really stands out to me is the ending of Laminex and Mirrors, where the protagonist rebelliously smuggles a hospital patient out for a smoke only to have to take him back into his ward through the main entrance and therefore get them both caught.

She recounts this experience as the one I remember most clearly from the year I turned The two of us content, just for this perfect moment. And their success resonates with the audience, even though the protagonist would have lost her job and therefore the income she needed for her trip to London, Kennedy demonstrates her strength in choosing compassion for an elderly patient. Even the sister in Whirlpool, who wasn't exactly kind to the protagonist in the beginning, forms an unlikely alliance with her against their mother, sharing a reckless moment and cutting their photo shoot short.

Bold leaps such as these are ones that take strength and therefore deserve admiration. However, more often than not, Kennedy's stories are more about the strength needed to simply cope with life, one day at a time. She explores the minutiae of her characters lives in a way that conveys the day to day struggles, but also hints at the underlying fortitude needed to deal with these things on a daily basis.

In Tender, the wife feels as if everything at home is on the verge of coming apart since her husband is only able to cook tuna and pasta casserole for their kids. However, when she must get a possibly malignant tumour removed, her concern of whether there'll be tuna and pasta in the pantry just in case, demonstrates her selfless nature. Kennedy thus creates a character who is strong for others, even when her own life at home is disorderly and her health may be in jeopardy.

The strength of gritting one's teeth and getting on with things in spite of emotional tension is a central idea across this collection, and many other examples are there for you to consider as well. And so we come to the end of our essay. Hopefully going through this gives you an idea of how to cover more bases with your evidence. Remember that you don't have to recount lots and lots of events, but it's more important to engage with what the events are actually telling us about people. This is particularly important for prompts like this one, where it heavily focuses on the people involved. That is it for me this week, please give this video a thumbs up.

If you wanted to say thanks to Mark, who has been helping me write these scripts up for a lot of the text response essay, topic breakdowns. If you enjoyed this, then you might also be interested in the live stream coming up next week, which will be on Friday the 25th of May at PM. I'll be covering the topic of analysing argument for the second time, just because there's so much to get through. I'll also be announcing some special things during that particular live stream.

So make sure you're there so you're the first to hear it. I will see you guys next week. Download a PDF version of this blog for printing or offline use. Close analysis of 'Cake' from Like a House on Fire. How to embed quotes in your essay like a boss. Like a House on Fire Essay Planning. Montana is narrated by David Hayden, now a middle-aged history teacher, reflecting on the summer of that changed his entire life.

However, Marie reacts to this idea with fear, anxiety and resistance. Gail concludes that something sinister must be happening for her to have such a reaction and she presses Marie for why she is so afraid. Marie then reveals to Gail that she has heard that Dr Frank has been sexually abusing many of his female Native American patients. This becomes the central source of tension, as Wes must decide between his duty as the Sheriff and his loyalty to his family.

This is all told from the perspective of David, our protagonist, who has to watch his father confront his Uncle Frank about these taboo accusations. Eventually, it seems they reach an agreement with Frank to stop the abuse. Marie is discovered dead the next day in her bed when Gail goes to check up on her. As the Sheriff of the town, Wesley is obligated to arrest Frank, but in order to spare Frank the embarrassment, he keeps Frank in their basement instead of sending him to jail.

Julian accuses Wesley of arresting him out of jealousy and he threatens to use his power within the community to set Frank free. At this point, Wesley realises that the power of his father would only be matched by the law, and he decides that he must officially prosecute his brother. That next day, David, Wes and Gail wake up to find Frank dead, having used broken glass to slit his wrists and commit suicide. Young David believes that this was the right action and hopes that everything would go back to normal. But as the story goes, this is not the case. Another key theme is prejudice, discrimination and the abuse of power. Firstly, it means that Frank managed to escape persecution, public denouncement and jail time.

Thus, Watson touches on the failures of the judicial system to consistently hand out judgements that are morally fair and instead reveals the flaws within the legal system of the time that reflect widespread and corrupt social attitudes. Watson also touches on the conflict between loyalty and morality. Should Wes arrest and prosecute his brother Frank or not? Should he stay loyal to his family or uphold the moral values that he must stand by as the towns Sheriff? She is a compassionate, idealistic and courageous woman.

This can also be seen as she stands up for Marie, despite the prejudices in the society at the time. After Wesley arrests Frank and takes him to the basement for imprisonment, David assumes his father killed Frank despite Wesley not being depicted as a particularly violent person in the novel. All it takes is an indistinct noise from the basement for David to conjure up ways his father could have killed his Uncle Frank. In reality, Frank is a criminal who abuses his power - both a white man and a doctor to sexually assault Indian women - which he believes he can get away with.

He dislikes Native Americans and frequently makes jokes about them and stereotypes them. He even uses the fact that Marie Little Soldiers is a Native American to belittle and doubt the credibility of her experience. Julian is a bigoted racist man who has an unconditional love for his son Frank and unfairly favours him over his son Wesley. Power-up your learning with free essay topics, downloadable word banks, and updates on the latest VCE strategies. The Rajasthan government has decided to recall the recently passed marriage registration bill to re-examine it, Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot said on Monday.

Jammu and Kashmir police has established a distress helpline for minorities living in Kashmir in the wake of recent spate of civilian killings. Union Minister of State for Petroleum and Natural Gas Rameswar Teli has compared the rising price of petrol with that of packaged mineral water and said that the price of such water is more. Maharashtra reported 1, new COVID cases on Monday, the lowest daily count in nearly 17 months, and 36 fresh fatalities, taking the infection tally to 65,79, and the deaths to 1,39,, a health department official said. The key question at the meet, sources said, was likely to be the possible fallout of last week's events in Lakhimpur Kheri. Two government teachers including Supinder Kaur were killed by terrorists in the Idgah Sangam area of Srinagar on Thursday.