Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers

I was getting better at it. A Hong Kong student. Some of them Nilsen had kept in bed with him for sexual purposes Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers as long as Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It week. Oct 8 Slash Film. United States. The suspects attacked the police officers but were arrested Essay On Voting Rights were booked under the names of Sayenko and Suprunyuk, but they were not the men currently on trial. The suspects' Promises In John Steinbecks Taeh Scream phones Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It personal Essay On Voting Rights contained multiple video recordings The Golden Age Of Television In The 1950s the Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers.

13 Terrifying Serial Killers You’ve Definitely Never Heard Of

Essay On Voting Rights Lane. This aroused the Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It of patrick stump tattoos drain inspector and his Essay On Mexican Religion, who immediately called the police. He sat in the flat with a half dozen other bodies awaiting disposal. Elias Koteas Sgt. When Barlow was released, Essay On Voting Rights came back and sat on Nilsen's The Four Horsemenon: Hollywoods Golden Age to Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It his return from work. Nilsen claimed the first traumatic event to shape his life came about when he was a small child, when his Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It grandfather Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It. According to Sayenko's confession, The Golden Age Of Television In The 1950s and Suprunyuk were "out for a walk. Hunger Games Symbolism Analysis pattern continued, with Nilsen recruiting "companions" at Two Eras Of Women In The 1970s pubs, until a plumber found Lessons Learned In Howard Schultzs Pour Your Heart Into It and rotten flesh in the apartment's sewer system. We have many plans and The Glass Castle By Jeannette Walls Life Lessons to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers we really need your help for this. Details Edit. Cruelty: Unidentified Serial Killers 16 April

Nilsen was astonished that he was able to get away with this and believed it would never happen again. He was wrong. It would happen fourteen more times. In October , nearly a year after the first murder, a young Chinese student, Andrew Ho, went home with Nilsen. The young man wanted to try some bondage play. Nilsen was disinclined, but put a tie around his neck and told him he was playing a dangerous game. Ho left and informed the police, but no charges were brought. By , Nilsen had killed twelve men in that apartment. Many of them may have been unemployed or homeless young men looking for a way to make money. Some were homosexual, and a few were male prostitutes. Nilsen claimed he went into a "killing trance," and on seven occasions, actually freed the men rather than complete the act, because he was able to snap out of it.

The second victim was Kenneth Ockendon, a Canadian tourist. He met Nilsen at lunch at a pub on December 3rd, They drank together for several hours, took a tour of London, and ended up in Nilsen's flat. They got along very well, and the more Nilsen enjoyed Ockendon's company, the more desperate he felt at the thought that the Canadian was flying home the following day. He strangled Ockendon with an electrical cord from some headphones, dragged him across the floor, and then sat down to listen to several pieces of music while the body lay there on the floor.

Then he removed the clothing and took him into the bathroom to clean him up. Once finished, he placed the corpse in bed and slept with it the rest of the night, caressing it frequently. In the morning, Nilsen stuffed the body in a cupboard, tossed out the clothing, and went to work. During the day, the body rigidified in a doubled up position. Nilsen took him out a day later and cleaned him up again. Then he dressed the corpse and sat him in a chair, taking photos of it in various positions.

When he was finished with that, he took the young man into his bed and positioned it, spread-eagled, on top of him. He spoke to Ockendon as if he could hear. Then he crossed his legs together and had sex between his thighs. Finally, Nilsen relegated Ockendon to the space beneath the floorboards. He took him back out several times so they could sit together and watch television. Then he would dress him in something fresh, put him to "bed" and tell him good night. Five months went by before it happened again. On May 13th, , Martyn Duffey, 16, turned up missing.

He was homeless and he accepted Nilsen's invitation to spend the night. After two beers, he went to bed. Nilsen climbed on top, trapping his arms under the covers, and strangled him. He went limp, but was still alive, so Nilsen carried him into the kitchen and drowned him by pushing his head into a sink full of water. Then he took him to the bathroom and got into the tub with him. Duffrey went into the cupboard for two full weeks, and then was placed under the floorboards.

The next one, Billy Sutherland, 27, slept with men for money. Nilsen did not even want to take him home, but he followed Nilsen after they went bar-hopping one night. Nilsen barely recalls strangling him and finding a body in his home the next morning. Malcolm Barlow, 24, was an orphan with mental problems. He was also a pathological liar. Nilsen found Barlow loitering outside his home, complaining of weakness from epilepsy, and he took him home and called an ambulance. When Barlow was released, he came back and sat on Nilsen's doorstep to await his return from work.

Nilsen invited him in and they drank together before Barlow fell into a deep sleep. Nilsen found his presence a nuisance, so he strangled him. The next day, he stuffed Barlow in the cabinet under the kitchen sink. He sat in the flat with a half dozen other bodies awaiting disposal. Some of them Nilsen had kept in bed with him for sexual purposes for as long as a week. Having control over these men thrilled him and the mystery of a dead body that would not respond fascinated him. It was his feeling that he appreciated them more deeply than they had ever been appreciated before.

Nilsen sprayed his rooms twice a day to be rid of flies that were hatched. Another tenant mentioned the pervasive odor, but Nilsen assured her it was the decay of the building. Once he contemplated suicide, but his dog came in, wagging her tail, and he decided against it. Instead he spat on his image in the mirror. To get rid of the corpses, he would put his dog and cat in the garden, strip down to his underwear, and cut them up on the stone kitchen floor with a kitchen knife. Sometimes he would boil flesh off the head in the pot he had bought for the first victim. He had learned how to butcher, so he knew how best to cut up a body, and he placed the organs in a plastic bag.

Then he would replace the whole package under the floor until the next step. At one point, there were two entire bodies beneath the boards and one dismembered. He also put pieces into the garden shed or down a hole near a bush outside. Internal organs he put into a gap between the double fencing in his yard. A few severed torsos he stuffed into suitcases. When he could, he dragged the bags and suitcases out to the yard and burned the bodies a few feet from the garden fence. It always amazed him that no one queried him about his activities or tried to stop him. In fact, when his apartment was vandalized, he had detectives investigate and they remained completely unaware that they stood over the remains of two men. Children came from the neighborhood to watch the blazing fire, which burned all day, and Nilsen warned them to keep some distance from it.

As the fire burned down, he spotted a skull in the center and crushed it into ash. Then he raked the remains of six men into the earth. Five more were still to die in that apartment, their remains consumed in a third bonfire. When he prepared to move to a new place, he checked around and nearly forgot that he had placed the hands and arms of Martyn Barlow near a bush. He took care of that final detail and then drove away, hoping to put this part of his life behind him.

Sixteen months later, after he was arrested, police officers found over one thousand bone fragments in his former garden. Nilsen had lost the use of a garden and even of a space underneath floorboards. The house where he moved had been divided into six apartments and his flat at 23 Cranley Gardens was an attic. He was sure this would be a deterrent for his compulsive homicides. However, three more murders took place, and his quarters presented a complicated problem regarding disposal. They had met once in a pub and had engaged in a long conversation. Then Nilsen was drinking alone one day when John walked in and recognized him. They chatted and then decided to go to Nilsen's place, where after drinking awhile, John got into Nilsen's bed.

Nilsen tried to get him to leave, but he refused to go. Nilsen then found a length of loose upholstery strap on an armchair and used it to strangle the man. At one point he feared he would be overpowered, so he tightened his grip as John fought for control. Then he struck his head and soon went limp. Nilsen kept the strap on him until he was sure he was dead, and then went shakily into the other room. He soon became aware the John was still alive. He lopped the strap around his neck again and held it for two or three minutes. However, John's heart was still beating, so Nilsen dragged him into the bathroom to drown him, leaving him there the rest of the night. Then he put the body in a closet as he contemplated how to get rid of it.

He decided to dissect it into small pieces and flush it down a toilet. He had to hurry as he had a friend coming to visit. When the flushing process took longer than expected, he boiled some of the flesh in his kitchen, along with the head, hands, and feet. Then the bones were separated and put into the trash. Some larger bones he hurled over the back garden fence into a waste area, and placed others into a bag sprinkled inside with salt and stored those in a tea chest. He covered that with a red curtain. The second man was Archibald Graham Allan. Nilsen made him an omelet, and what he recalled of this death was rather odd.

He thought the man might have choked on the egg dish. He placed Allan into a bath and left him there for three days, then dissected him as he had with John the Guardsman. The third and last victim was Steven Sinclair, age 20, who took drugs and loitered about the Leicester Square. On January 23rd, , some of his acquaintances saw him go off with strange man. They went to Nilsen's home where Nilsen sat and listened to music, while Sinclair shot up and then fell asleep in a chair.

Nilsen went into the kitchen and found some thick string, thinking to himself, "Here we go again. He draped the ligature over the sleeping man's knees and poured himself a drink. Then he sat and contemplated all the pain in Stephen's life and decided to stop it for him. He went over, made sure he was deep asleep, and then used the string-and-tie ligature to strangle him. He struggled slightly and then went unconscious.

Nilsen told him, "Nothing can hurt you now. Nilsen then bathed him and put him into the bed. He placed two mirrors by the bed and removed his clothes so that he could look at the two of them naked together. He experienced a feeling of oneness and thought that this surely was the meaning of life and death. He talked with Stephen as if he were still alive. The dog jumped into bed with them and sniffed at Stephen. Nilsen turned the young man's head toward him and kissed it. He had no idea that this corpse would betray him and finally be the cause of his undoing.

Nilsen believes his troubles can be pinpointed to the traumatizing sight of his grandfather's corpse. It was an unhappy marriage, full of conflict from Olav's drunkenness and long absences. The marriage lasted seven years until Betty divorced Olav. She and Dennis, along with his two siblings, were already living in the home of her parents, since her husband had never provided otherwise, so they just stayed where they were. Young Dennis especially loved his grandfather, Andrew Whyte, but when Dennis was only six, Andrew died. Without telling Dennis what had happened, his mother took him in to see the corpse, which triggered a terrible awareness of devastating loss.

He says in retrospect that it caused a sort of emotional death inside him. When he was eight, he nearly drowned in the sea, and was rescued by an older boy who was playing on the beach. The boy must have been aroused by Nilsen's prostrate body, for he removed his clothes and apparently masturbated onto him. Nilsen awoke to find a sticky white substance on his stomach. Then his mother remarried two years later and he withdrew and became a loner. She had four more children and little time for Dennis. He never exhibited rage, cruelty to animals or other children, or any type of aggressiveness typically associated with conduct-disordered boys who become killers later in life.

In fact, he was horrified by cruelties that he witnessed by others. Once he helped to search for a man who had turned up missing, and he and a friend found the man's corpse on the banks of a river. The man had wandered out in the night and had drowned. The body reminded Nilsen of his grandfather, whose death and permanent departure he had been unable to comprehend. He felt oddly distant. Having had no sexual encounters as an adolescent, but having experienced attraction to other boys, Nilsen remained fairly innocent. Once he had looked at his brother's sleeping form, exploring his naked anatomy, but that had been quickly aborted. In , he enlisted in the army and became a cook, which is how he learned butchery.

He began to rely on alcohol to stave off loneliness, although he kept his distance from others. It was during these years, when he finally got a private room, that he would lay down in front of a mirror in such a way as not to see his head and pretend to be unconscious. The "other body" aroused him and he would masturbate as he contemplated it. During the last few months of service, he met a man whom Brian Masters, in the definitive book on Nilsen, called "Terry Finch," and they developed a close friendship. Nilsen was clearly in love and he got the young man, who was not gay, to pretend to be dead while he took home movies. Their parting was a source of great pain for Nilsen.

He destroyed the films he had made and gave the projector to Terry. In , he trained to become a policeman. One of the experiences he recalled was seeing autopsied bodies in a morgue. He found himself fascinated. Nevertheless, this job was not for him and after a year, he resigned. He got employment as a job interviewer and remained with that until his arrest. He met a young man there, David Painter, who was looking for a job. Nilsen later encountered him in the street and they went together to Nilsen's flat. Painter crawled into bed and fell asleep. He awoke to find Nilsen taking pictures of him, and he created such a row that he hurt himself and had to be taken to a hospital.

Nilsen was questioned by the police and released. He fell into a life of casual pick-ups, but was trouble with how transient and superficial they were. He sought something more enduring. He was ready to commit, if only someone would commit to him. His fantasies in the mirror developed more bizarre qualities. Now he thought of the "other" body as being dead-a state he perceived as emotional and physical perfection. He even used make-up to achieve a better effect, including mixing up some fake blood to make it appear that he had been murdered.

He imagined someone coming in to take him and bury him. Sometimes it worried him to be so in love with his own dead body. In , he moved into Melrose Place in north London-a ground floor flat with a garden--with a man named David Gallichan, who denied that their friendship was homosexual. They bought a puppy, which they named Bleep, and then added a cat. Two years later, with their diverse personalities causing considerable distress to both, Nilsen ordered Gallichan to leave. Afterward, however, he felt very afraid that he would end up alone. He threw himself into his work, became increasingly more political, drank more, and watched a lot of television.

The killings began a year and a half after Gallichan left. The last body Nilsen dissected-that of Stephen Sinclair--got the same treatment as the two preceding it. He boiled the head, hands, and feet, and placed the rest in plastic bags. He put one part in a cubbyhole in the bathroom and others went into the tea chest. Some of the flesh and organs were flushed down the toilet. Nilsen may also have dumped some large pieces, because a man found a bag ripped apart near his garden, some distance away from Nilsen's, which contained what looked like a rib cage and a spinal column.

He did not report it and it disappeared within a few days. It was never tied to Nilsen. There were five other tenants at 23 Cranley Gardens, but none of them knew Nilsen very well. During the first week of February, one of them noticed that the downstairs toilet was not flushing properly. He tried to clear the blockage with acid, to no avail. Other toilets seemed to be functioning as poorly, but Nilsen denied that he was having any problems. A plumber arrived to investigate, but his tools did not work.

He called in a specialist. Nilsen feared that his own activities might be at the heart of the problems downstairs, so he stuffed the rest of Sinclair's body into plastic bags, along with the partially boiled head. He locked the remains into the closet. He stopped flushing the toilet. Two days later, in the evening, a company called Dyno-Rod arrived to examine the blockage. Deciding it was underground, the technician, Michael Cattran, went into a manhole by the side of the house. He noticed a peculiar smell. Cattran was convinced it was from something dead.

He spotted sludge about eight inches thick on the floor of the sewer and found that it was composed of thirty to forty pieces of flesh. It had come from the pipe leading from the house. He reported his find to his superiors. The tenants gathered around him as he phoned, including Nilsen, and he mentioned that they might have to call the police. First, however, his company would do a better analysis by daylight. He then took Nilsen and one of the other tenants back outside with him to see the pile of rotting flesh. Nilsen returned at midnight to remove the particles of flesh and dumped them over the fence. He thought about replacing them with pieces of chicken from the store, and then pondered suicide.

Instead he sat alone in his flat and drank, surrounded by the body parts of three men. However, the downstairs tenants had noticed his movements. When Cattran returned and found the sewer cleaned out, the tenants told him their suspicions. From deep inside the sewer, he pulled out one piece of foul-smelling meat and called the police. At work on the day of February 9, , Nilsen told a co-worker, "If I'm not in tomorrow, I'll either be ill, dead, or in jail.

But Nilsen sensed something coming. When he stepped into the dark hallway to go to his flat, he saw three men waiting for him. Detective Chief Inspector Jay told him they had come about his drains. He told Nilsen that human remains blocked them. Nilsen exclaimed in dismay, and then asked, "Where did it come from? They pointed out that it could only have come from his own flat, and asked about the rest of the body. Nilsen gave up and said he would come to the station.

He knew his rights and admitted that he wanted to talk, and talk he did, as he unburdened himself in sickening detail. The more he talked, the more the police realized that they had been given clues over the past four years and had they acted differently, might have stopped the killing spree much sooner. A search of Nilsen's closet uncovered several bags of male remains in various stages of decomposition. These were taken to a mortuary for examination. Nilsen told them to look in the tea chest and under a drawer in the bathroom. He also pointed them toward his former apartment where he had killed "twelve or thirteen" men.

He admitted that there were seven others whom he had tried to kill and had failed. In the police station, Nilsen said, "The victim is the dirty platter after the feast and the washing up is an ordinary clinical task. Nilsen began to spill out the details of his murders at once, despite being cautioned. His formal questioning began on February 11th. It lasted over thirty hours, spread throughout the week. Nilsen talked about his techniques and helped the police to identify parts of the victims. He did not really require much prompting. The information flooded out, as if to purge his conscience and get rid of every possible memory.

He made no digressions and did not plead for compassion. He also exhibited no remorse. He claimed later that his professional training allowed him to feign calmness so the officials could take down the information. He told them what they would need for conviction, but nothing personal. Privately, he was afraid and deeply disturbed by what he had done. Thanks to Nilsen, it was possible to find the various pieces of bodies and assemble them into a person, as they did with Stephen Sinclair.

His lower half was in a bag in the bathroom. From there they could figure out which torso was his, along with the rest. With a definite identity, they were able to charge Nilsen and hold him pending further investigation. Nilsen also accompanied police to Melrose Avenue and pointed out where he had buried things and made bonfires. A lawyer was now appointed to Nilsen named Ronald T.

Moss, who listened with the police to Nilsen's detailed confession. He was satisfied that Nilsen understood what was happening. When one police officer insisted that Nilsen was a predator, with malicious intent, Nilsen responded, "I seek company first, and hope everything will be all right. Later he wrote his gruesome memoir for a young writer, Brian Masters, who turned Nilsen's ramblings into a book. As Master's says, "Nilsen is the first murderer to present an exhaustive archive measuring his own introspection. His prison journals are therefore a unique document in the history of criminal homicide.

After the confession, Nilsen was removed to Brixton Prison to await his trial. He was troubled by the reaction of the press that immediately followed his arrest. Many young men-and even a woman-came home with Nilsen and left unharmed, but a few just barely managed to escape, and some of those had made police reports. A more thorough investigation may have saved some lives. Nilsen claims that he made seven attempts in which he was either fought off or later changed his mind. He recalls the names of only four, but three of them testified against him at trial. In October, , Andrew Ho made a complaint.

He said Nilsen had attacked him, but he would not make a written statement or agree to attend court as a witness, so there was no follow-up. Perhaps Ho did not want to admit to his own solicitation of Nilsen. Barcodes did not even exist in any stores until the summer of , and most items did not contain barcodes for several years after that. Quotes Dave Toschi : [bedside phone rings. In a tired attempt to answer the phone, accidentally knocks over a lamp, which shatters] [into phone] Dave Toschi : Whoever this is, you owe me another lamp.

Crazy credits The end text reads as follows: Following Mike Mageau's identification of Arthur Leigh Allen, authorities scheduled a meeting to discuss charging him with the murders. Allen suffered a fatal heart attack before this meeting could take place. In , a partial DNA profile, that did not match Allen, was developed from a 33 year-old Zodiac envelope.

Investigators in San Francisco and Vallejo refused to rule out Allen as a suspect on the basis of this test. He was cleared of all charges that he wrote the Zodiac letter. Paul Avery passed away on December 10, of pulmonary emphysema. He was His Ashes were scattered by his family in the San Francisco Bay. Robert Graysmith lives in San Francisco and enjoys a healthy relationship with his children. He claims he has not received a single anonymous call since Allen's death.

A three-way conversation laying Leigh as a suspect to get a search warrant Extended audio montage over a black screen Plus extra bits of dialogue. User reviews Review. Top review. Interesting story but 30 mins too long. I also think the ending is really anti-climatic - but then again I understand that it's based on a true story. FAQ Why do houses in San Francisco seldom have basements? What is 'Zodiac' about? Is 'Zodiac' based on a book? Details Edit. Release date March 2, United States. United States. Vallejo, California, USA. Paramount Pictures Warner Bros. Phoenix Pictures. They discuss the murder calmly, expressing mild surprise that the victim was still breathing after a screwdriver was plunged into his exposed brain. The suspects then wash their hands and the hammer with a water bottle, and begin to laugh.

Only two suspects appear to be present in the video, with one always behind the camera. The suspects were also found in possession of multiple photographs showing them attending funerals of the victims. They can be seen smiling and " flipping off " the coffins and gravestones. Evidence of animal abuse was also shown in court, with the suspects posing alongside mutilated animal corpses. The photographic and video evidence was shown in court on 29 October , as part of a larger presentation of over photographs and two videos. Judge Ivan Senchenko responded by stating: "You are not blind.

The man whose murder is recorded in the leaked video was identified as Sergei Yatzenko from the village of Taroms'ke [ uk ; ru ]. His murder took place on 12 July , and his body was found on 16 July. He had recently been forced into retirement due to a cancerous tumor in his throat. The treatment left him unable to speak for some time, but Yatzenko was unhappy with being unable to work and continued to find odd jobs around the village. He took on small construction work, repaired cars, wove baskets and cooked for his family. He was beginning to regain his voice at the time he was murdered. Yatzenko was married and had two sons and one grandchild. He also looked after his disabled mother.

At around on the day of the murder, he called his wife to say he was going to fill his motorcycle and visit his grandchild. He never arrived at his grandson's house, and his mobile phone was turned off by His wife Lyudmila called a friend and walked around the village, afraid that her husband might have fallen ill or had a motorcycle accident. They could not locate any sign of him.

They also could not file a missing person's report, since in Ukraine a person cannot be declared missing until at least 72 hours after last being seen. The next day, Lyudmila posted photographs of her husband around the village and enlisted more local help to search the surrounding area. Four days later, a local who saw one of Lyudmila's posters remembered seeing an abandoned Dnepr bike in a remote wooded area by a garbage dump. He took Yatzenko's relatives to the scene, where they discovered his mutilated and decomposing body. The fact that Yatzenko's murder was captured on video was unknown to the public until a court session on 29 October The unedited video of the murder was shown as part of a large presentation by the prosecution, causing shock in the gallery.

The court agreed with the prosecution that the video was genuine, that it showed Suprunyuk attacking the victim and that Sayenko was the man behind the camera. The video showing the murder of Sergei Yatzenko was leaked to a shock site based in the United States and dated 4 December Ekaterina Levchenko, adviser to Ukraine's minister of the interior, was critical of the leak but admitted that control of videos on the Internet was "virtually impossible". On 11 February , the court in Dnipro found Sayenko and Suprunyuk guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced both to life imprisonment. Hanzha, who was not involved in the killings, was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to nine years in prison.

Hanzha said of Sayenko and Suprunyuk: "If I had known the atrocities that they were capable of committing, I would have not gone near them at gunpoint. The court's verdict was several hundred pages long and read out over two days. The lawyers for Sayenko and Suprunyuk announced their intention to appeal, saying that the authenticity of the photographic and video evidence was not established beyond reasonable doubt. The claim was dismissed by Edmund Saakian, a lawyer for one of the victims' families, who commented: "In theory a photo can be faked, but to fake a forty-minute video would require a studio and a whole year.

The parents of Sayenko and Suprunyuk repeated their belief in the innocence of their sons. Vladimir Suprunyuk claimed that Igor had been tortured to extract his confession, with the police covering his head and forcing him to inhale cigarette smoke. Speaking at a televised press conference, he cited irregularities in the investigation and said that the case against his son was false. On 18 August , the Supreme Court of Ukraine referred the case back to the Dnipro regional court of appeal. The move was welcomed by Igor Sayenko, who stated that it was a step towards clearing his son's name. A spokesperson for the prosecutor's office said that the decision to refer the case back to the appeal court was procedural, and they were confident that the verdict would be upheld.

The appeal was scheduled for 5 October It was also reported that Igor Sayenko was considering setting up a website about the case. Hanzha did not appeal against his nine-year sentence. In April , it was reported that Alexander Hanzha had been released from prison after serving nine years and is married with two children. Journalist Michele Canale flew to Dnipro and interviewed a range of people involved in the case. The parents of Sayenko and Suprunyuk maintained the innocence of their children, while detectives involved in the case gave their recollections and repeated the lack of confirmation for the theory that the murder videos had been shot as snuff films for sale overseas. Lidia Mikrenischeva, an elderly woman who survived a hammer attack and helped to identify the killers in court, was also interviewed.

She recalled being struck on the head from behind and falling to the ground, but her life was saved when the dogs accompanying her barked loudly and scared off the attackers. Natalia Ilchenko, the mother of the first known victim Ekaterina Ilchenko, recalled finding her daughter unrecognizable after the hammer attack and commented that the killers should not be compared to animals because they killed for fun.

The documentary was notable for showing a wide range of previously unseen photographs and video material from the case. From an anonymous source, the filmmakers obtained a longer and unedited version of the mobile phone video showing the murder of Sergei Yatzenko on 12 July Sayenko and Suprunyuk are seen standing at the woodland roadside next to their Daewoo Lanos taxi, waiting for a suitable victim to arrive and discussing what they are going to do.

At one point, Suprunyuk is seen looking through binoculars for any approaching vehicles. He can also be seen posing with a hammer, which he conceals inside a yellow plastic bag. After 20 minutes, Sergei Yatzenko arrives on a bicycle and is knocked to the ground before the attack in the woods next to the road begins. Yatzenko's children were asked to take part in the documentary, but they declined. According to the commentary, at least five more murder videos are known to exist. The documentary also showed brief excerpts from a five-minute video of the murder of another victim of the maniacs, an unidentified man. At one point in the video, the killers comment that the man has a gold tooth.

The man was killed with blows to the head and a knife, with some of his personal belongings taken as trophies. The documentary also showed a video recording of Sayenko's confession, in which he admits that robbery was a motive for some of the killings. A video of Hanzha was also shown, with his face bruised after an alleged beating by the police. Michele Canale attempted to obtain an interview with the killers in prison but was denied by the Ukrainian authorities. A range of motives for the killings was examined, and it was concluded that despite the court verdict, there are still unanswered questions about the case.

The attacks, which involved a mallet and knife, began in December Both were arrested after a video recording showing a female body being mutilated with a knife was found on a camera belonging to Lytkin's uncle, who had become suspicious. According to media reports, the youths were influenced by reading about the Dnepropetrovsk maniacs on the Internet. A psychiatric examination found them sane, and they told doctors they chose weak people as their victims. On 2 April , Anoufriev was sentenced to life imprisonment, and Lytkin to 24 years in prison. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Ukrainian serial killers. Ukraine portal. English-language media coverage of this case almost invariably used the spelling "Dnepropetrovsk".

Archived from the original on 15 January Retrieved 25 December Casefile: True Crime Podcast. Archived from the original on 27 August Retrieved 27 August Novomoskovsk City News in Russian. Archived from the original on 24 August Dneprodzerzhinsk News in Russian. Archived from the original on 17 February Retrieved 13 January Archived from the original on 28 March Retrieved 11 February Archived from the original on 23 February Gazeta in Russian. Zavtra in Russian. Archived from the original on 19 April Retrieved 31 May Versii in Russian.

GlavRed in Russian. Archived from the original on 6 June MyCityUA in Russian. Archived from the original on 12 March