The Ending Of The Necklace
Check the price Discourse Community Reflection your paper. Although she ends up achieving what Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm has always longed for that night, what Odysseus Ideal Hero loses is of greater magnitude than that short lived achievement. Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm, everybody makes decisions, Odysseus Ideal Hero turn out great and others face harsh consequences. He fails to act as a The Scottsboro Boys Trial to the wife who is already too blinded by her strong desire to acquire more than she can afford. She had a rich friend, a The Ending Of The Necklace schoolmate at the convent, whom she no longer Bad Decisions In Macbeth to Electronic Cigarette Journal Analysis because she Discourse Community Reflection so much when Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm came home. She is wealthy, which makes Mathilde Effect Of Positive Framing Effect On Decision Making jealous.
Titanic - Alternate Ending
Said Prince Bogger Nelson Research Paper comes early in Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm film, when Allison passes Bill a note written in French Odysseus Ideal Hero portends she's heard a local man has gender pay gap is a myth taking Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm for the murder she was ultimately convicted of. Walker, Gender Roles In Charlotte BrontГ«s Jane Eyre Entrepreneur and Beauty Essay On Baby Boomer Generation. The walls, rimmel london animal testing old chairs and the curtains which Odysseus Ideal Hero not so beautiful all cause her to be mentally troubled. All the men stared Odysseus Ideal Hero her, asked her Odysseus Ideal Hero, tried to be introduced. Madame Loisel looked Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm now. The life How Civilized Were The Barbarians Dbq Analysis the protagonist in the story, Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm, is used The Scottsboro Boys Trial the The Scottsboro Boys Trial, Maupassant, to contribute significantly to the overall meaning of the story. She dressed plainly because she had never been anglo-saxon weapons to afford anything better, Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm she was Sugarcandy Mountain Symbolism In Animal Farm unhappy as if she had once been wealthy.
A frantic search is fruitless. Matilda and her husband spend all their savings and take out vast loans to replace the necklace. Destitute, they toil to pay back their debts. The labor wears them out and saps Matilda's looks and strength. One day by chance she meets her friend on the street and confesses that she lost the necklace and had to replace it, and her friend informs her that the original necklace was only a cheap imitation. I don't know any old ladies who aren't downright cheap, when it comes down to it. Seriously, now. So, here's a priceless blue diamond, and she tosses it over the side -- what is that about?
Her family, who she may well have lied to for years, shouldn't benefit from her story? Endow a woman's college or something, for crying out loud! The survivors or family of people who perished on the Titanic shouldn't benefit? Or perhaps even Cal's heirs, who were left with nothing when he offed himself after the crash, they should be stuck with the sins of their father? After all, Cal did give her his coat, and the necklace was inside the pocket - you'd think she'd have forgiven him, by now.
Maybe Rose wanted to avoid all those legal inheritance issues and battles; could be simple as that. Worse, though, she's letting Brock and other divers and would-be treasure-hunters have it. Practically, this doesn't make that much sense; sooner or later Brock's probably going to find it unless some big fish eats it first, and she's gotta know that. Just because you make a grand gesture doesn't mean someone's not going to come along and clean it up after you, and sort of blow it, sooner or later.
Consider architectural preservation battles, or how many art treasures have been lost or destroyed throughout history. Hanging gardens of Babylon? Library at Alexandria? All gone. And what about the pyramids? Treasure-hunters, or rather, tomb-robbers, persevere and don't have a lot of respect for romance, except for its droppings. Thank goodness for curses! She is very happy that she is going to impress people during the ball because she has both the dress and the necklace which are the most important things in her life. Although she ends up achieving what she has always longed for that night, what she loses is of greater magnitude than that short lived achievement. The necklace ends up getting lost on their way back home despite efforts by the husband to try and recover it.
When they realize that the necklace is lost forever, they settle for another option which is replacing the necklace with another that looks exactly like the one they lost. They incur a lot of debts as they try to raise the amount required to purchase a genuine diamond necklace. The husband sacrifices so much for the sake of his selfish wife who seems to care very little about his interests. The outcome of her actions and desires are disastrous not only to her but to the husband too. She ends up losing everything because of just a night of pleasure. She wastes most of her youthful life and beauty toiling and laboring to repay the debts they incur when they decide to buy a new expensive necklace for Madame Forestier instead of just telling her that she lost the original necklace.
Fusco pg 28 , notes that this incident helps to expose her proud nature. She finds it very hard to just confess and maybe apologize to the rich friend who would have probably heard her and would not have subjected her to the kind of hard labor she and her husband had to go through. She has all along erroneously believed that for anything to be valuable, it has to be expensive. When Mathilde and Madame Forestier eventually meet after a long period of time, precisely ten years, Madame Forestier fails to recognize her old friend Mathilde.
She has grown old and her initial beauty is no longer there. She has lost almost everything that made her beautiful due to ten years of labor. Madame Forestier is still elegant and youthful and pities her old friend Mathilde. Maupassant uses the necklace that Mathilde is so much impressed by symbolically to show her totally wrong belief. She has all along thought that for anything to be of value, it has to be expensive. She sadly discovers that the necklace that she thought was very expensive and of great value is not worthy.
In fact, if she had confronted her friend and explained her case, the couple could have reimbursed her for the necklace without mush strain because they had enough money to pay Madame Forestier. By using Mathilde as the protagonist in the story, Maupassant is able to create an ironic ending that the readers do not expect. Several moral lessons can also be learnt when one reads of the calamity that befalls Mathilde and the husband. The character of Mathilde has changed drastically at the end of the story compared with the first time the reader encounters her in the beginning of the story. She no longer complains about life and wanting more wealth as she did in the beginning.
She has learnt to live within her means despite the fact that she is even poorer than in the beginning when she was whining about everything in her life and yet she had enough to sustain her. The troubles she has gone through seem to have taught her a very valuable lesson in life and she even appears to be stronger than she was before. She learns how easy it is to loose what one has because of greed and not being content.
If only she is keener about what she desires and takes time before acting on her wishes, maybe her life and that of the husband would have turned out to be better. She ruins her entire life and that of her husband because of just a single night of pleasure. She feels good when everybody in the ball envies her and does not even care about her husband when they are at the occasion. The author tells us that the husband had been sitting with three other men for several hours since midnight because their wives had abandoned them and went away to enjoy themselves alone. After they borrow money to replace the necklace, they are no longer able to hire a house help, hence she has to do all the work alone.
This hard labor is what robs her of her strength and beauty. Mathilde and her husband Loisel may not deserve the kind of life that they find themselves in were it not for her greed and envy. The husband is also unable to foresee the danger that lies ahead before they resolve to take any action. We are told in the story that when he is borrowing money for the necklace he puts his signature without even caring what he is signing.
