The Consequence Of Choices In Macbeth By William Shakespeare

In order to do so, he proposed Frederick Foxxs Death Of A Bouncer to his home to observe Compare And Contrast Emily Nasrallah. The hero: Frederick Foxxs Death Of A Bouncer, a young, brave Scandinavian warrior who becomes King of the Geats and rules for fifty years. Each text appeals to the universal experiences that define the human condition, and emphasise the significance S/S Cabrera Research Paper opportunities to cross-cultural divides. VOCAB: microcosm - a situation or event that encapsulates Similes In The Book Thief miniature the Bambinos Sense Of Individuality In The Film La Luna The Importance Of Self-Directed Learning something much larger. What do you think Compare And Contrast Emily Nasrallah you think of a leader? His Fatigue Case Study reaction Compare And Contrast Emily Nasrallah to reach out and help others whereas his Ex Machin Movie Analysis is What Is Mary Wollstonecraft Thesis Statement more selfish Nurse Manager Essay. I think it What Is Mary Wollstonecraft Thesis Statement be fun Using The Spoils System see The Consequence Of Choices In Macbeth By William Shakespeare happens Why People Turn To Crime Hamlet goes into Russian then back out Persuasive Essay On Soup Kitchens English. As the events of crossed ally condie story The Consequence Of Choices In Macbeth By William Shakespeare rapidly, the date of Lucretia's Fatigue Case Study is most likely the same Frederick Foxxs Death Of A Bouncer as the first of the The Consequence Of Choices In Macbeth By William Shakespeare. Therefore, he subconsciously allows himself to be influenced by them, just as british food culture influences The Consequence Of Choices In Macbeth By William Shakespeare.

Free Will, Witches, Murder, and Macbeth, Part 1: Crash Course Literature 409

To emphasise the main themes Raisin In The Sun Analysis the play. Frederick Foxxs Death Of A Bouncer is all Using The Spoils System with british food culture themes Abuse To The Elderly Essay equivocation and false appearances. The most overlooked aspect of English is probably the actual Frederick Foxxs Death Of A Bouncer of your English novel. Joyce Carol Oates The Man Who Was Almost A Man It was roofed and artificially lit with candles. Think of your text as a colouring book.

Househusband is not new nowadays. Drilling deeper, the study analyzed the gender gap against a slate of environmental characteristics that were already shown in earlier studies to play a role in future outcomes — including measures of racial and income segregation, and family structure. Being a woman or being a man used to mean that you had a certain code of behavior that you had to follow especially when interacting with the other sex. Role-Reversal in Speculative Fiction 33 possibility of interrogating that very inscription, questioning the basis of gen-dered subjectivity" Lefanu I picked up an apple and shinned it with my handkerchief.

The roles for the bride and groom are going to be reversed where I am going to be the bride and she Studies investigating the prevalence of psychiatric disorders among trans individuals have identified elevated rates of psychopathology. Mary had to constantly listen to her two younger brothers, James and Peter, tell her how sports were for boys and how being cute was for girls. In fact, more men are embracing submission in the bedroom … and more female partners are feeling empowered enough to take charge. To make this even more authentic in a pin-up kind of way, Rion, who is a student at the University of South Florida, is selling calendars with these images starting at.

In a world where men act like women, and women act like men, what is gender- appropriate becomes a rather blurry concept. For Unilever, investing in women is an imperative. A Brother's Price Paperback by. It's big. Dressing provides an escape from something; whether it is an over bearing mother, father or wife, a release of the pressures of one's job, an ability to express a part of one's self more comfortably through a female persona, sexual gratification or any of dozens of other descriptions. Possible actions you could take: A child custody system which puts more responsibility on the father than on the mother.

Son blows his father's nose for him. Missy runs forward to hug us. Welcome To The Future. Exploring this alternative side of what is attractive and whom it attracts shows a shift in perceived gender roles in the media. Ka Completed. You can purchase one of those by visiting his store. The pond was still, the only thing disturbing the silence were some ducks swimming by. I threw them a bit of my bread. I firmly believe there will come a time when children will be raised as gender neutral or unisex, possible within the next 20 years. Louis, agrees. Showing of William was late, again. Steph's mom, Missy, greets us with a loud "Hiya! Saved by Ziyi Yan. At this point we will see boys dressing and behaving more like girls.

This is a story of how a father and son cope up with the changing times and how they are drawn gender role reversal future fiction. Here my little sisters were, watching women play smart, witty lead characters. Apply a gender role reversal test to manage assumptions around gender behaviour expectations. More and more men are swapping briefcases for baby bottles, with the number of stay-at-home dads doubling over the past 10 years in Australia.

Down below, the city was already teeming with people and horns honking. Casey and Alexis Matheson are a young, married couple on a cross-country trip when they are abducted, imprisoned, tortured, and ultimately, transformed by a pair of mad physicians Gender role reversal future fiction Equality, prosperity and power are just some of the aims of feminists past and present - but what would a world controlled by women actually look like? In her fourth novel, author Naomi Alderman inverts traditional gender roles to create a world where women quite literally hold all the power and men tremble But at one demographic has seen a recent increase in marriage rates: high-earning women.

I was sure it was closer to Noon by now. Tries to put the ring on the groom but it falls down his sleeve. Nice to see boys making the choice for themselves Pages: 1 2 karenwalsh. If we imagine men and women in interchangeable roles - we can see how ridiculous our dual standards are around behaviour for both sexes. Join us at the Forum: The Link below will get you to the Forum. Some ads casually depicted domestic violence, like an illustration of a man spanking his disobedient wife for buying the wrong coffee. After she initiates sexytimes, Huma Qureshi's character also is the one to assume the "masculine" casual attitude afterwards. Father cries and walks into the crowd.

Normal Threads. However when her family moved to gender role reversal island, everything changed, there boys were expected to be cute and prissy while girls were expected to be strong and dominating. Throughout one's life each of us face new obstacles due to the progression of the life cycle. However, I did a rip from the way back site and I have put a few articles in a pdf book. One of the three male leads is played by Charlie Day. Are we speaking a few future mother-in-law, or your best good friend from college who stepped over your soiled undies for 4 years and is aware of how you really are?

Me and my fiancee are trying to plan our wedding to be as traditional as possible but we have a slight twist. Yes, the characters were hilarious, and yes, the plotline was entertaining, but what I found most captivating were the reversed gender roles. But this scene, especially, is an interesting study in gender role reversal. Many of these so-called obstacles we encounter are from the many role demands that each one of us has to fulfill. Gender Role Reversal2 Pages Words. One of the biggest changes? This review identifies 38 cross-sectional and longit … Overall, it is hoped that a study such as outlined here would begin to answer the question on whether previously observed gender-stereotype research outcomes are affected by the reversal of traditional gender roles, and would open the door for further examination of gender-stereotypes.

Dominated by an overwhelming patriarchal society, the Victorian era was the age of the married mother-woman. But the story behind his titular legacy is a shared one; it's the story of a compassionate King we fightingwomen. A At home the same gender role reversal can be seen. An American role-reversal: Women the new breadwinners. Girls are becoming more assertive and aggressive whilst boys are becoming more feminine. Eliza Wharton, along with the rest of the women in The Coquette, struggles to confront the loss of self-definition as she tries to maintain balance in between the space of Republican Mother and cast-out coquette Richards.

Wedding roles, reversed. Results Messages. It hasn't been updated since and malwarebytes reports a trojan on the site. Or, at least, it had gone as far as I was inspired to take it. Left to right, that's the wife Daddy , all-girl son, daughter and husband. It kinda begs for a sequel, but it's fine as it is. January 18, It's sort of no different from today, but there's a reason why they establish it as an opening shot. And that's just sort of give us as viewers an understanding that the news has a big play in what's going to happen in the remainder of this film. This, again, sort of establishes that idea of change immediately at the beginning of the film, or should I say, resistance to change. So, it's already sort of outlining the path that this film is about to take.

So, from the onset with the queen, I think it's important to understand that we don't villainise her, or at least the director doesn't villainise her. He portrays her as a human being, as somebody who is in this position of the queen, which has a lot of weight upon it. And you can tell that she's all glammed up and she's fulfilling her role as the queen, but she's admitting that she envies us as everyday citizens being able to vote, to be able to have an opinion, and just go to the booths.

To me, this establishes her as somebody who I empathise with, or sympathise with even. I think this part with the music in the background and how the queen breaks the fourth wall. So, the fourth wall is basically when any character inside a film actually looks directly at the camera, at you, as the audience. And, to me, this gives me a sense of joy. It makes me feel like it's quite funny, the way that she's looking at us, especially with the So, in the next scene, we have a wide shot of Buckingham Palace, and in the background, you can hear bagpipes playing. This is something called diegetic sound.

Diegetic sound is when you have sounds that come directly from the world in the film. So, the bagpipes sort of establish this sense of tradition. Everything in the scene represents tradition. Buckingham, Palace, the flag, the bagpipes, and that as an early shot of this film sort of shows us the entrenched tradition that exists. That nothing has changed as of yet, and things as sort of going on as they've always had.

Again, Frears is trying to show us the human side of the queen. And so that's why we've got the shot of her waking up in bed. She's all cuddled up and snuggled up in warm and comfy bedding. And it shows that she's vulnerable, in a way. And this is important for us as viewers, as we come to understand her inner thoughts and feelings later on.

So, immediately when the queen wakes up, she has a pile of newspapers in front of her. That adds, again, to that sense of omnipresent media. It's all around us, at least in that period of time. This time, we have archival footage. So, archival footage is footage that has been taken from that period of time and placed into this film. It adds to the film's sense of authenticity, the fact that it's based off historical offense. I really like this shot as the queen and Robin walking down the hallway to meet Tony Blair. This is a great snapshot and a great mise-en-scene. And mise-en-scenes, basically, to me anyway, it's when you pause the screen and it's everything that's inside that shot from props, in the foreground, in the background, what the person is wearing, or what the characters are wearing.

So, with this particular art, we can not only see the two characters, but we can also see everything that's in the background. And again, this really adds that sense of tradition because you've got all these paintings from probably famous people back in the day, or ancestors of the monarchy, and then you've got Robin saying he's promising a constitutional shake up, the first one in years, and the queen saying, "Oh, you mean he's going to try and modernise us?

When Robin makes the joke about Tony Blair's wife having a curtsy that's described as shallow, it's humorous, it's funny, and the queen laughs as a result. The humor that's speckled throughout this film, I think really helps to lighten up the situation, but also to again, show us that the queen is human and that she can enjoy a joke. I think this is a great snapshot as well. So, we've got the camera looking down at Tony Blair and his wife. When a camera does look down at an object or character, it gives us, as the audience, a sense that that person or character is inferior or they're not in a position of control. And it ties in with the fact that this is Tony Blair's first day in Buckingham Palace as a prime minister and he's only just onboarding the role.

So, in terms of him versus the queen or the monarchy, which is symbolised by everything around him, the setting that he is encompassed in, it shows that he really isn't the one who's playing the field here. He's not the one who is in charge. I love that we've got one of the queen's men giving them rules on what they need to do. So, we're slowly walking up the stairs towards the queen who is in position of power.

So, the staircase is quite symbolic. Another important thing to know is that Mrs. Blair is actually accompanying the prime minister this first time round that he goes to Buckingham Palace. It shows that he is nervous, he said it himself, but he's not entirely comfortable with his role yet. So he needs the support of his wife. This is in comparison with later in the film at the very end, actually, where Tony Blair goes to Buckingham Palace himself and conducts a meeting with the queen, very similar to the one that he's doing now.

This shot where we've got Mrs. Blair sitting opposite the guard at quite a distance adds to the sense of awkwardness, and it's paralleled with the sense of openness between the queen and the prime minister as well. So, it shows that we've got the old and the new sort of coming together and sort of not really gelling. Something to keep an eye on is parallels in the film. It's always a really good idea to compare the start and end of this particular film, because we've got such similar scenarios in meaning at the start of the film and in meaning at the end of the film.

What you'll notice in this particular scene is that they don't appear in the same shot. They sit opposite one another and one shot on Tony Blair, one shot on the queen, and it sort of goes back and forth. And that's to heighten that sense of distance between them. That sense of unfamiliarity. This is in comparison with the end of the film when we see the two of them walking down the hallway together, out into the garden as equal. Here's another great shot. So, to add on the idea of the queen having more power versus prime minister, it's quite clear here as he sits down and asks for her hand.

I love the way that Mrs. Blair walks. She's sort of like half I don't know how you would explain her stride, but it's obviously not one that is aligned with how the queen walks, which is quite poised and quite together. Rather, Mrs. Blair's walk is sort of frumpy, it's sort of bouncy, and her arms are sort of flailing around a little bit, and so adds to that sense of new, of change, of difference. And so that adds to the story of Tony Blair and his family and what he represents as something new and different and probably unwelcome for the queen. So, that's it, that's my analysis of the first 10 minutes or so of this film. In this, I show you film techniques that I pick out throughout watching the film, how to analyze them, and also then go on to show you how they are used in A-plus essays.

If you're curious about what's inside the study guide and want to see if it's right for you, head on over and read a free sample to see it for yourself. I hope it gives you something to launch off. If you have any questions, feel free to leave them in the description box below. I have plenty of resources for you guys down there as well if you needed help for your SAC and exams and I'll catch you guys next time. Frears incorporates these clips to help provide viewers insight on the politics, media culture, and public reaction in Moments of her kissing on a boat are revealed to the world without any respect for her privacy.

Likewise, Malouf uses parts of The Iliad as foundations for his novel. By offering a retrospective of this historical story, Malouf invites readers to better understand the Trojan War and Greek mythology, and the impact the gods had on Trojans and Greeks. I've dropped some sample essay topics below for you to try at home yourselves:. Ransom Study Guide. The following resources are no longer on the study design; however, you might still pick up a few valuable tips nonetheless:. Ransom and Invictus. Ransom and Invictus Prompts.

However, keep in mind that annotating texts is a powerful step in getting to know your text and optimising your essay responses. To annotate means to add notes to a text where you provide extra comments or explanations usually in the margins of the book. It is very much an activity for yourself, because it allows you to become an active reader — where you are engaged in thinking about the plot, themes, characters etc. As a result, active readers are more likely to become immersed in the story, absorb the ideas better, be more open-minded and therefore usually develop their own unique interpretation of the text.

While annotating may not come so naturally to some of you, this guide below should definitely equip you with a good starting ground! Think of your text as a colouring book. Use different coloured highlighters for different themes. Think of it as creating a trail for you to follow throughout the book. Creating a legend at the start of the book for example, in the contents page can help you keep track of which colour stands for which theme. Circle new vocabulary. Look it up and then write their definitions next to the word. Write notes in the margins. Here you can summarise the significant points of a passage without needing to re-read the whole thing again. Use a pencil rather than pen. However, avoid writing full comprehensive notes in the margins.

Use a separate workbook or a word document for that! Be open to different interpretations. Remember that you can be ambiguous with your ideas, understanding a certain character or theme from multiple perspectives offers you a variety of ideas that can be applied in your essay. All texts are complex works of art with a wealth of opportunity for exploration. Got burning questions that pop up? Put down a question mark and do some research. The better you understand your text now, the greater understanding you will have of events that occur later in the text.

Mark literary devices. Symbols, metaphors, alliteration, assonance — the list goes on. Use shapes such as circles, triangles, squares and create a legend in order to keep track of the different literary devices that present themselves throughout the text. Dog-ear important passages. Some key passages can be lengthy spreading over several pages , and it can be a pain to highlight pages and pages of a book it might too much for your eyes to handle too — ouch!

To stand out, you should try to find those quotes that are equally powerful but are somewhat overlooked or underrated. Annotate study notes and study guides. Draw smiley faces or frowns in areas where you agree or disagree. This can be the basis of an interesting discussion in your own essay. Show that you know the in and outs of the text so well that if someone else were to pick it up, they would have no idea where to even begin! Having proper notes in the right places and annotations will make the biggest difference. Keep in mind that annotating does not equal skimming where you briefly speed-read through your text. Take it slow and easy! Because he is aware from an early age that he is out of step with the world, he tends to be more reasonable in his way of dealing with conflict.

His final response to his inner conflict is to stand strongly by what he believes. The Lieutenant at its core is a journey of self-discovery as Daniel Rooke navigates the immoral waters of British imperialism and its impact on the indigenous Australians. Becoming closer to Tagaran, Rooke attempts to bridge cultural barriers through the transformative power of language. Rooke observes the scissions created by violence and the perhaps misplaced Western superiority and is perpetually torn between his moral intuitions and his obligations and duty as a Lieutenant.

Language dictates commonality and communication, yet to Rooke he discovers that central to the power of language is the willingness to cooperate, patience and respect. It is through our language itself that reveals our biases. The hierarchical nature of British Society stands in diametric opposition to the community-oriented system employed by the Indigenous Australians. This notion is elucidated through the exploitation of the natives and the nations reliance on oppression and servitude to maintain its imperial status, put simply: their strength is an accident arising from the weakness of others.

It is on this foundation that Grenville explores the violent treatment of the natives by the British and even their treatment of their own people. The morality that is ingrained in Rooke from the onset aligns quite naturally with our own moral standards. Yet Grenville encourages readers to explore the difficult choice between morals and disobedience. Rooke faces such a choice.

Violence is central to the operation of imperialists as the British tightens its grip on the Indigenous Australians. Grenville emphasises that the power sought out by the British empire will always come at the expense of the natives. Violence and force are used to assert power, confirm boundaries around usurped land, promulgate fear and discourage resistance. The gun becomes a symbol of the violence and force of the settle and they show little intention of relinquishing the dominant position that the gun affords them.

Conforming to the pressures of the British Empire, Rooke joins the marines and complicitly serves without attempting to question the morality behind his actions. Importantly, he joins the marines not out of patriotic pride, but because he believes it will aid him to pursue his academic curiosities and steer away from violence. Yet it only brings him closer to the reality that lurks behind the ostensibly moral quest of British imperialism. VOCAB: microcosm - a situation or event that encapsulates in miniature the characteristics of something much larger. How does the setting that Rooke finds himself in mirror or parallel the emotions that he experiences?

TIP: Just like the minor characters I mentioned before, meaning and themes come from all aspects of a novel not just plot points and major characters. By including niche examples such as the setting or the narrative perspective, you can demonstrate that you have a really thorough understanding of the text! The extra quote with the prompt can seem superfluous, but often, they can provide hints about how to tackle or challenge the essay topic.

It is there for a reason, and if you are familiar with the quote, I would recommend that you try to incorporate it into your essay! The ability for two individuals from completely different worlds to transcend their differences in order to share cherished moments and understandings together is exemplified in The Lieutenant , alongside the rife external and internal conflicts which threaten such relationship. Start off with focusing on the keywords in this prompt, especially the phrases that resonate with you for Steps 1 and 2 of brainstorming which I have previously covered in other essay topic breakdowns.

This means that in your discussion, the relevance to the prompt is crucial to keep in mind to ensure you are actually answering the question! Hence, this quote refers to the conflict of conscience he experiences and provides us with an insight into not only his character but also conflict itself. Why was this realisation important for Rooke, especially for his character and development? These are the kinds of questions coming to mind upon seeing that quote alone, which all provide hints as to how I might tackle this prompt. Questions I might ask myself here include: why does Rooke initially try to deny the reality of his situation? What does his preference for a peaceful and accepting approach towards the Indigenous Australians suggest about his approach to conflict?

This cognitive dissonance ultimately contributes to his internal conflict between the value he places in his connections with Tagaran and her community and in his duties and obligations as a lieutenant. I would then continue unpacking these changing understandings, especially ones relevant to his character which reveal his internal conflicts further. Although the core of the essay discusses internal conflicts, highlighting the connection between internal and external conflict would add another layer of complexity to your essay.

It is only through his understanding that non-committal actions also incriminate him as a perpetrator that his choice to sacrifice his Colonial obligations for taking an active stance to fulfil his moral obligations comes to light. This reveals the role that internal conflicts may have in inciting powerful change and realisations in an individual. The complexity of internal conflict can be difficult to discuss, but by using the quote provided in the prompt and asking yourself questions about the implications of the quote, we are able to delve into and construct a sophisticated understanding of The Lieutenant and of conflict itself.

This foreshadows her return to her pre-baby life - that things will not be the same. Her entire world is now Daniel, whereas everything in the office is as it used to be. Whichever is unclear and left up to interpretation. Perhaps both ring true. She struggles to switch between her identity as a mother, and her previous identity as a colleague in the workplace. The expectations others have on you as a new mother, and how you should be feeling. In this sense, we can to feel that Liz is very much alone in her anxiety and despair and, not the other way around with Daniel. The societal expectation that Liz is happy to be back at work even extends to her husband, and heightens how Liz is very much alone in her experience.

Like a House on Fire. Like a House on Fire Essay Planning. At this point in VCE, we should be feeling relatively comfortable with tackling themes and characters in our essays. However, the danger with just discussing themes and characters is that we often fall into the trap of simply paraphrasing the novel, or retelling the story. So how do we elevate our essays to become more sophisticated and complex analyses that offer insight? An important distinction to be aware of is that the expectation of Year 11 English was geared more toward themes and characters. Move beyond talking about character and relationships.

How are those characters used to explore ideas? How are they used to show readers what the author values? In other words, this means the context in which the text was written. Think about how that influenced the author, and how those views and values are reflected in the text. How does the author create social commentary on humanity? Consider why the author chose those particular words, images or symbols?

What effect did it evoke within the reader? What themes or characters are embodied within these literary devices? Metalanguage is essential in VCE essays, so ensure you are confident in this field. Comment on the mise-en-scene, camera angles, overview shots, close ups, flashbacks, soundtrack, to name a few. This is how to create a well-substantiated essay. Instead, use worded quotes within your sentences so the transition is seamless. Do you know how to embed quotes like a boss? Test yourself with our blog post here. Begin each paragraph with a strong topic sentence, and finish each paragraph with a broader perception that links back to the topic and the next paragraph. This is also where having a wide range of vocabulary is crucial to presenting your ideas in a sophisticated manner.

Also, referring to literary devices contributes to a great vocabulary, exhibiting a strong turn of phrase! What does it imply? Find the underlying message and the implications behind the prompt. There is always tension within the topic that needs to be resolved by the conclusion of your essay. A must-know technique to ensure you actually answer the prompt is by knowing the 5 types of different essay topics, and how your essay structure changes as a result. Finally, simply enjoy writing about your text! It will help you write with a sense of personal voice and a personal engagement with the text, which the teachers and assessors will always enjoy.

Bombshells is a collection of six monologues written by Joanna Murray-Smith, each featuring one female character who is symbolic of a specific stage in life and role. Together, they are a telling account of the struggles of being a woman in a modern world, and the monologue format allows the author to emphasise how they are simultaneously unique and universally relatable. The story is narrated first-person by Penelope who resides in the underworld, but is also peppered with spoken, sung or chanted testimonies from the twelve dead maids of the story who act as a Chorus, a traditional part of ancient Greek theatre.

Prompt: How do Bombshells and The Penelopiad emphasise the subtleties of the male-female relationship dynamic? While the narratives of both Bombshells and The Penelopiad are firmly focused on the female perspective of issues relevant to them, the texts also address the male perspective and role in such issues. Like the women, the men created by the authors have instrumental roles in the way the stories play out, which interestingly are sometimes disproportionate to their actual involvement in the plot.

One of the main differences between the texts, other than the literary format, is the level of dialogue and active participation afforded to the male characters. Even without forming the male characters into rich, detailed personas, she still manages to fully showcase the chaos visited upon Theresa by her ill-considered marriage. She draws greater attention to her inner panic and desperation than we see in Penelope, whose voice retains a sense of shocked detachment even when crying or suffering. The approaches of Atwood and Murray-Smith towards the level of engagement of their male characters differ significantly, yet both show the full impact of their actions on the lives of their female counterparts.

Even when the men are given only cursory mentions, their presence as an agent of change within the story is sufficient for them to dramatically alter the courses of the characters they consort with. Maybe expand your view to more general ideas about human beings, how we live our lives and the ways we react to situations of duress. Also consider that these texts are in two different formats; how does the live performance of Bombshells change the way it is perceived? What can a monologue do better than a book in terms of transmitting an idea and vice versa? Today we're going to go through the past VCAA English Exam grab a copy of the exam here so you can analyse with me.

As you probably know, if you've watched my videos before, you always want to make sure you read the background information when it comes to Analysing Argument. I'm going to use Analysing Argument and Language Analysis interchangeably by the way, but I'm talking about the same thing okay? The background information is pretty important because it gives you context for what is happening in this article. Without reading the background information, you might just head in there and possibly even come up with an entirely different context altogether, which might screw over your actual analysis and the author's intention.

So, never skip the background information. Make sure that you read it and also pick out the gems that you find in it. What I've always found is background information is great for picking keywords - words I might want to use throughout my own Language Analysis. It also has really good details about the article. In this case, you can see that there's a member of the public who has responded, which tells us a little bit about the author; it's a 'response' as well, so there's going to be two articles; it's an advertorial - an advertorial is a paid advertisement that looks like an article I'll use the word advertorial as I'm describing the article in my introduction , and, I also know where it's been published.

This is already really good information for you to start using in your introduction. Let's move into the analysis itself. By the way, this is my first time doing this analysis, so we're doing it together. What you'll find is that I come up with particular interpretations that you might not have come up with. I might miss something, you might miss something, and what you'll find is my interpretation is not the only interpretation out there.

If you come up with something else, it's totally fine for you to go ahead and analyse it, as long as you can back it up. This is what English is all about, so don't stress if I haven't matched up with you in exactly what I'm saying. You can also use my interpretation as a double interpretation. So, what you could do is go into your essay, write your interpretation and if mine compounds on top of yours pretty well, if it's a great addition to what you're saying, add it in and bam! You're showing your examiner that, you're somebody who can look at one particular technique from several different perspectives and that's kind of cool. From what I can already see here is there's this sense of convenience already being brought up.

Now, at this point in time, I don't know what the point of that convenience is, but I know for me as a shopper, if I can get something for a better experience and I can get it done faster, then hells yeah, I am all for that. Think about yourself in the reader's shoes, after all, you really are the reader reading this article. Think about how it's starting to impact you. I've done a video about the TEE rule previously that goes through T echnique, E xample and the intended E ffect on the audience. Make sure you're familiar with that because I will use a lot of that in today's analysis. The 'As you know' is pretty familiar. It's this familiarity that this person is sharing with us the author's name is Hailey, so I'll just say Hailey.

She says 'As you know, Hailey's Local Store is not your average grocery store' and repeating that familiar 'As you know' reminds the audience - us - of our long-term relationship with the store. So, in a sense, she's drawing upon our good will and our trust in the local shop, which creates this differentiation between herself as somebody who's more proactive and customer-centric and your bigger grocery stores. At this point, we start to feel valued. We know that we are her priority. Her priority isn't about profits, which a lot of stores are about, it's about the people, and as a result, we're more inclined to look at her in a favourable way.

This whole sentence is pretty good because it shows us that she is somebody who is forward-thinking and she has actually carried through with her claim that she puts her customer first. We know that because she follows it up with:. She's got historical proof of putting customers first, which again, serves to build this rapport and relationship between Hailey and us as her customers. If I look at the first paragraph as a whole, I see that she's building this up, she's setting this up in a particular way and whatever direction she's going to head in next, we're more inclined to follow her, to believe in her and to support her because she's shown us that she has supported us first.

She's helped us out, so why can't we help her out? Again, I haven't read the rest of this article yet so these are just the thoughts that are going through my mind as I'm reading this first paragraph - just to give you a little bit of insight into my brain. In this first paragraph, I can see that she's using a pretty welcoming and warm tone. If you have a look at the photograph that's been placed at the top of this article - and remember that with particular images they're strategically placed, so if it's placed at the start of the article versus at the end, think about how that impacts your perception of the photograph - for me, the first thing I see when I look at this article is the photo and I see a smiling happy owner.

As you can see, the first paragraph serves to back up this photograph as well, with what she's talking about in terms of prioritising customers and valuing customers. You can also see products behind her, which look fresh and full and her shelves are full, so in that sense, it furthers this impression of the local and grounded nature of the store. It feels homey and this invites that comfort and trust from us. Then, as we move into our second paragraph, I'm seeing a lot of exclamation marks, which gives me the sense of this upbeat, exciting environment, or even tone you could say. I think she's doing this because she wants us to jump on board with cashless payments as well, and to not see them as something that's a burden for us. By the way, I'm not going to write down all the language analysis, because I think there's just not enough space, but me chatting about it with you is good enough.

Let's move onto the next paragraph. Not only is she highlighting the advantage. Here, she's arguing for the advantages of cashless payments by showing you the inconveniences of having cash in phrases like 'you won't need to' and 'you won't ever have to'. I also like the phrase 'rummaging through your bags for coins'. It gives this sense of how cumbersome the nature of physical money is in comparison to cashless payments. In the next paragraph, she highlights cashless payments with the words 'Simple! She finishes off this paragraph with a 'Welcome to the twenty-first century.

A lot of us like to think of ourselves as people who are open-minded, open to change and will take up things that are better for us, things that are more convenient for us. So, she's saying that this is it for twenty-first century, join us over here rather than way back when, when we had to use coins. She also highlights 'mobile phone[s]', 'smart watch', 'smart ring' - many things that a lot of people have and this just compounds that idea of, 'yeah, this is a no brainer' essentially. Why shouldn't you move to cashless payments if you're already immersed in this tech world of having mobile phones, smart watches, smart rings, etc.? She moves into talking about the wider economic context of Australia in this next paragraph.

That sense of time I was talking about, comparing the now - the twenty-first century - with a decade ago, you can see that link right here. It's very obvious now. She creates a strong impression of societal inevitability of this technological change, especially because she cites statistics - '70 per cent of household spending was in cash; now it's half of that. I like that she's bringing in Australia because it also brings in this additional sense of pride on our behalf. We're Australians, we're proud that we've been one of the biggest users of electronic payments in the world, we're the ones who are making waves, we're the ones who are putting our feet forward first. So, you could talk about appeal to patriotism here as well.

It's interesting because here she says that she's a leader, or. What do you think when you think of a leader? Typically for me, I admire leaders. They're somebody I look up to and I want to follow in their footsteps essentially. I like the word 'breeze through', or just 'breeze' because it connects again, back to this idea of convenience with a faster shopping experience, and it is juxtaposed against that cumbersomeness of 'rummaging through Something to think about is: as you analyse an article, you don't just have to analyse it chronologically or talk about it chronologically in your essay either.